FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE ON MONEY LAUNDERING
FATF

FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE ON MONEY LAUNDERING
1998-1999 REPORT ON MONEY LAUNDERING TYPOLOGIES
INTRODUCTION
1. The group of experts met on 17-18 November 1998 under the chairmanship of Mr. Simon
Goddard, Head of Intelligence, Strategic and Specialist Intelligence Branch, National
Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS). The meeting took place in the conference room of the
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in London. The group comprised
representatives of the following FATF members: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada,
Denmark, European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg,
the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom,
and the United States. Experts from non-member international organisations with observer
status, namely the Council of Europe, Interpol, the International Organisation of
Securities Commissions (IOSCO), and the World Customs Organisation (WCO), also attended
the meeting. The Council of Europe Select Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of
Anti-Money Laundering Measures (PC-R-EV) was represented by Slovenia.
2. The purpose of the 1998-1999 typologies exercise was, as in previous years, to
provide a forum for law enforcement and regulatory experts to discuss recent trends in the
laundering of criminal proceeds, emerging threats, and effective countermeasures. While
discussions of this exercise generally focus on money laundering developments within FATF
member nations, the experts also attempt to examine available information on current money
laundering patterns in non-member countries and other regions of the world. Prior to the
meeting, delegations were invited to provide written submissions to serve as the starting
point for discussions. In a departure from the format of earlier typologies exercises,
this years meeting was led off with in-depth presentations on a series of major
money laundering issues that had been agreed upon during the FATF plenary meeting in
September 1998.
3. The present report, therefore, focuses first of all on these major issues: the euro
currency unit and large denomination banknotes, problems associated with offshore
financial centres of non-cooperative countries or jurisdictions, challenges posed by new
payment technologies, and the potential use of the gold market in money laundering
operations. The report then continues with an examination of other money laundering trends
in FATF countries followed by the overview of trends in non-member jurisdictions.
MAJOR MONEY LAUNDERING ISSUES
The single European currency and large denomination banknotes
4. The euro currency unit became the single currency of eleven European Union member
states 1 on 1 January 1999. At that time,
existing national currencies of the participating members became simply an expression of
the euro. During the transitional period that started on 1 January, the euro
will not be issued in physical form; the participating members will continue to use their
existing coins and notes. On 1 January 2002, euro coins and banknotes will be introduced,
and, the existing national currencies of the participating members will then be withdrawn
as legal currency by 30 June 2002 at the latest. The exact time for this final
changeover period (to occur between 1 January and 1 The eleven EU members involved in the introduction of the new currency include:
Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands,
Portugal, and Spain..3 30 June 2002) will vary according to the
implementing legislation of the individual participating member states.
Impact on Money Laundering
5. The primary period of potential risk is the six-month window during which the
national currencies in paper and coin form will be exchanged for the euro. Some experts
expressed the fear that money launderers might use this window to try to introduce
illegally derived funds by hiding them among the expected higher volume of operations
involving exchanges of national currency for the euro. Other experts believed
that there might be a rise in laundering in the time before the changeover by using
traditional methods, by exchanging these funds for currency from outside the euro zone, or
by increased use of professional services providers all to avoid detection during
the actual changeover period.
6. With the elimination of 11 national currencies, it was agreed that the role of
bureaux de change in the countries of the euro zone would diminish with regard to money
laundering and its detection. Nevertheless, there could be an increase in exchange
activities in those European countries outside the euro zone, especially involving
traditional currencies such as US dollars, UK pounds, and Swiss francs. Moreover, once
money has been converted to euros, the movement of these funds over national borders
within the countries of the euro zone will cause less notice. One northern European
country stated in its written submission that it might see an overall increase in the
volume of cash in circulation prior to 1 January 2002 (with, for example, a possible
influx of non-EU money specifically Russian held US dollars exchanged for
euros).
7. The experts believed that there was little likelihood that international money
launderers would convert national currencies to the currencies of non-participating
countries (Danish or Swedish kroner, Greek drachma). The only exception, as mentioned
above, is the UK pound, which will likely continue to be important in laundering related
to certain types of narcotics activity. As for FATF countries in other areas of the world,
the experts were of the opinion that the changeover to the euro would have little affect
on laundering in North America, Asia or Australia, where the US dollar will probably
continue to be the primary currency used in such activity. They recognised, however, that
the euro used in wire or electronic transactions may turn up in money laundering
operations anywhere in the world after 1 January 1999.
Impact on Anti-Money Laundering Measures
8. Almost all of the FATF member countries who are taking part in the changeover to the
euro have started to pay attention to the specific money laundering concerns surrounding
the introduction of the euro. The Netherlands, for example, has had a working group since
1996 to examine the problem and provide recommendations on necessary countermeasures. In
Germany, the Federal Criminal Police produced a study in early 1998, which addresses the
issue of the euro introduction as related to potential criminal activity. Italy has also
set up a euro implementation co-ordinating committee of relevant ministries and
authorities that will issue detailed implementation rules that take in to account the
money laundering risks.
9. Many delegations felt that current anti-money laundering (preventive) systems should
be adequate for detecting potential money laundering in this area. Since the changeover to
the euro in banknote and coin form will require that national currency be physically
presented at a financial institution, there was also felt to be a greater risk of
detection for the launderer involved in such cash transactions. It was stressed that all
member countries should continue to promote vigilance at financial institutions with
regard to suspicious transaction reporting both prior to and during the changeover
period..4
10. The experts considered the possibility that the increased volume of all activity
during the changeover period might overwhelm financial institutions personnel and might
make them therefore more likely to miss or disregard potential indicators of money
laundering. Another concern was related to which institutions actually perform the
currency conversions. One FATF member country feared that non-bank financial institutions
involved in the changeover might not have adequate guidance on what constitutes suspicious
activity regarding euro conversions.
11. A number of FATF members mentioned that they would increase awareness of the issue
and reinforce anti-money laundering measures during the transition period. In the
Netherlands, the potential problem with non-bank financial institutions is being dealt
with by permitting only banks to carry out exchanges of national currency for euros.
Germany will permit other financial services to perform these exchanges, however, only
when these institutions are licensed to do so by the Federal Banking Supervisory Office
(as is also required for operating a retail foreign exchange business). Additionally, the
Federal Banking Supervisory Office issued new guidelines in March 1998 that lowers the
threshold (whereby customer identification is required) to DEM 5,000 (USD 3,018) for
conversion transactions.
12. Other issues brought up by the experts related to cross-border implications of the
introduction of the euro both within and outside the countries of the euro zone. Italy
mentioned that conversions of large amounts of national currency in other than its country
of origin should be an indicator of suspicious activity. Similarly, conversions of large
amounts of national currency to euros by individuals domiciled in other countries might
also be a suspicious indicator. The United States raised the question of how existing
national currencies (of the euro zone countries) held abroad will be exchanged for euros.
These concerns highlight the fact that an internationally co-ordinated approach
relative to the introduction of the euro still must be articulated for developing
common money laundering indicators, specific sector guidelines, and sharing the
information procedures among relevant national anti-money laundering services.
Introduction of the Large Denomination Euro Banknote
13. With the introduction of the euro in banknote and coin form (after 1 January 2002),
the highest denomination banknotes will be EUR 500. This note will be roughly comparable
in value to the highest denomination banknotes issued by Germany and the Netherlands. A
number of FATF members have expressed concern that the issue of the high denomination euro
banknote might make the currency more attractive to money launderers.
14. Several of the delegations saw the introduction of the large denomination euro as
not only relating to the euro currency but also a potential problem in all countries
having high denomination banknotes. Some of the countries of the euro zone already have
high denomination notes (Austria, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands), and the EUR 500 note
was designed, according to the European Commission, to fulfil a similar role to that of
the original national currency. Moreover, there are large denomination banknotes in other
FATF member countries as well (Canada, Singapore, Switzerland), which may continue to
exist after the introduction of the euro.
15. The legal use of large denomination notes is currently may often be concentrated in
certain economic sectors (used automobiles, livestock, etc.) although this use could not
account for all of the large denomination notes issued. Most delegations, including those
from countries with large denomination banknotes, recognised that incomplete information
is available on the legitimate use of these notes.
16. A number of FATF member countries have observed that large denomination notes tend
to be used in the hoarding of money related to tax evasion or avoidance and in criminal
activity. US cases illustrated how the bulk of small denomination currency and the
difficulties involved in.5 transporting it are still the primary obstacle for money
launderers (and one of the easiest ways to detect them). As a further example of criminals
preferring large denomination notes, Germany stated that kidnappers routinely demand that
ransom money be provided in DEM 1,000 notes. In Canada, the CAD 1,000 bill was originally
introduced to facilitate bank to bank transfers. This licit use has become outmoded with
the ability of banks to transfer funds more rapidly and safely by electronic means.
Criminal money movements with these banknotes now show up almost exclusively as related to
casino winnings. A case was cited in which CAD 70 million (nearly USD 45.7 million) in CAD
1,000 bills were alleged to have transited or still to be located in safety deposit boxes
of a bank in central Europe.
17. Despite the fact that there is an incomplete understanding of the uses of large
denomination banknotes in the legitimate economy, some of the experts felt strongly that
the introduction of the EUR 500 banknote after 1 January 2002 may facilitate laundering.
Other experts believed that large denominations may only facilitate movement of cash
(whether legitimate or not) and not money laundering. Large denomination banknotes draw
too much attention at financial institutions, thus presenting a potential launderer with
increased risk of detection; therefore, middle-sized denominations might be
more suitable for the purpose of money laundering. Criminal proceeds denominated in EUR
500 banknotes would be considerably less bulky than the equivalent value of funds
denominated in USD 100 bills. Current anti-money laundering measures within FATF members
should be adequate for detecting suspicious cash transactions (including large
denomination banknotes). However, with the expanded geographic region that comprises the
euro area, there will be fewer internal points at which to detect suspicious currency
shipments. It was therefore suggested that study of the subject should continue with a
view toward clarifying the legal and illegal uses of large denominations.
18. In discussing the use of large denomination banknotes for laundering, and in
particular the potential use of the EUR 500 note after 1 January 2002, the experts drew
attention to the fact that the money laundering implications of the EUR 500 note do not
appear to have been considered in planning for this large denomination banknote. The
reason that the EUR 500 banknote was developed was to offer a denomination that would
correspond with already existing high denomination banknotes in the countries of the euro
zone. It was also noted by some of the experts that the use of high denomination notes in
potential illegal activities, such as money laundering or tax evasion, was not taken into
account. One delegation indicated that this issue had indeed been considered. Although
experts mentioned a few economic activities in which the use of large denomination
banknotes is especially common, the role of these denominations in legitimate commerce has
apparently not been examined either. The majority of the FATF experts considered that the
potential legitimate and illicit uses of large denomination banknotes ought to be
thoroughly examined by the European Central Bank Furthermore, a number of the experts
called for the FATF member countries to continue to study the subject with a view toward
augmenting any other examination at the international level.
Offshore financial centres of non-cooperative countries or territories
19. During the past ten years, FATF member countries have made significant progress in
adopting anti-money laundering regimes based on the standards set forth in the FATF Forty
Recommendations. This progress has also been reflected in the increasing co-operation
among members on anti-money laundering investigations. In non-member countries and
jurisdictions, there have been signs more recently of an increased willingness to follow
the FATF Forty Recommendations and co-operate on anti-money laundering investigations.
This increased acceptance of FATF standards contrasts, however, with the unwillingness or
outright refusal of certain important financial centres to co-operate in this area. The
issue of non-cooperation was therefore identified by FATF members as one that should be
addressed during the annual typologies.6 exercise. The typologies discussions on the
subject would then serve as a starting point for broader discussions on the issues of
international co-operation. Prior to the experts meeting, FATF members were asked to
examine the specific operational problems or difficulties that they had encountered with
offshore financial centres in such areas as banking secrecy, shell companies,
identification of beneficial owners, exchange of information, and other forms of
international co-operation.
Impact on money laundering
20. Past typologies exercises began the task of identifying how offshore
financial centres facilitate money laundering. The experts at this meeting agreed
that schemes involving these jurisdictions still appear to share common characteristics: a
series of multiple financial transactions through the centre, use of nominees or other
middlemen to manage these transactions, and an international network of shell companies
(including a specialised off-the-shelf variety that immediately go dormant
upon completion of the series of transactions). Often an individual money laundering
scheme will include more than one of these centres. An investigating agency can usually
see the path that questionable funds follow into or out of such a scheme; however, the
exact links between the funds and the illegal act that generated them are lost.
Investigations of this type are often therefore unable to be fully exploited to a
successful conviction or confiscation.
21. The oft-stated reason for creating an offshore financial centre has been to provide
certain fiscal advantages to natural or legal persons that use its services. Since tax
evasion schemes and money laundering operations often appear to use similar techniques,
many money laundering experts believe that the quest for optimal fiscal
advantages is frequently used as a cover for moving to or through such locations
what are in reality criminally derived moneys. One expert pointed out during this
exercise, however, that there appears to be one significant difference between the
techniques used for taking fiscal advantage of an offshore location and laundering
criminal funds. In the former case, the funds usually move to a single offshore location
where they are sheltered from the home countrys fiscal oversight. In the latter
case, that is, involving criminally generated funds, the tendency is for the funds to move
rapidly through several offshore locations.
Impact on anti-money laundering measures: Role of the foreign legal entity
22. Virtually every FATF member represented at the experts meeting reported having
experienced problems in pursuing anti-money laundering investigations with links to
offshore financial centres. However, it was also pointed out that some offshore centres of
non-cooperative countries were attempting to improve the level of judicial or
investigative co-operation within the current framework of their national laws or by
making selected changes to their legislation. The experts agreed, therefore, that the
problem was most acute with those jurisdictions that are slow or unwilling to assist in
international anti-money laundering investigations, particularly in regard to identifying
the beneficial owners of legal entities.
23. FATF written submissions and a certain amount of discussion by the experts focused
on the major problem posed by foreign legal entities to successful conduct of anti-money
laundering investigations. Obtaining information from some offshore jurisdictions on the
true owners or beneficiaries of foreign registered business entities shell
companies, international business companies, offshore trusts, etc. appears to be
the primary obstacle in investigating transnational laundering activity.
24. A number of FATF member countries mentioned that they regularly attempt to request
information on foreign legal entities using mutual legal assistance treaties or other
agreements with the offshore jurisdiction. Often non-cooperative jurisdictions refuse to
respond to a foreign request for investigative or judicial assistance because there is no
bilateral agreement that would permit such co-operation. The jurisdictions might also
refuse the foreign request because the information.7 requested is not maintained in any
official registry. In some cases, information on legal entities may be protected from
disclosure to foreign investigative agencies because of strict banking secrecy (with a
variation related to non-release of fiscal information, including criminal or civil
liability for disclosure) that is impenetrable even to domestic judicial or regulatory
authorities. Some delegations also mentioned the increasing use of the Internet for the
marketing and provision of such services.
25. The experts also highlighted the role of professional services providers in
ensuring the good functioning of money laundering operations through non-cooperative
jurisdictions. These solicitors, accountants, financial consultants, and company formation
agents facilitate the creation of appropriate business entities that serve as the pipeline
for moving funds of legal, as well as illegal, origin. Typically, such services are
provided to non-residents of the jurisdiction and often at a higher level of
confidentiality than that available to residents.
Potential solutions
26. In this regard, the experts hoped that the FATF ad hoc group on non-cooperative
countries and territories, which was established in September 1998, would be able to
develop strategies for addressing the issue. Several members pointed out that they are
able to rely, in some cases, on existing international mechanisms for the exchange of
information relating to money laundering investigations: mutual legal assistance treaties,
memoranda of understanding, and Interpol. Nevertheless, these mechanisms do not work when
the jurisdiction receiving the request for assistance refuses to honour it or does not
maintain the desired information. The consensus of the experts was that every country or
jurisdiction should have a mechanism in place for establishing the beneficial owners of
legal entities registered within it and should have the authority to share this
information with foreign counterpart investigative agencies. The development of
internationally recognised minimum registration requirements would be welcome in this
regard. Some of the written submissions also suggested that the so-called fiscal
exemption should no longer be valid grounds for refusing a foreign request. The work
of the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) was also mentioned as a
potential channel for resolving this issue, given its work at the operational level to
facilitate information sharing and the fact that many offshore financial centres already
take part in its activities.
New payment technologies
27. All delegations continue to report that there have not been as of yet any
investigated money laundering cases involving the new payment technologies identified in
previous typologies reports. However, there have been several instances of other types of
crimes generally fraud schemes against unsuspecting members of the public
that have used the Internet as a means for committing the underlying offence. Law
enforcement in FATF member countries remains concerned about the potential for use of
these new technologies in money laundering schemes. Specifically, some of these risks
include:
· inability to identify and
authenticate parties that use the new technologies; ·
level of transparency of the transaction; · lack or inadequacy of audit trails, record keeping, or
suspicious transaction reporting by the technology provider; · use of higher levels of encryption (thus blocking out
law enforcement access); and · transactions
that fall outside current legislative or regulatory definition..8
Status of new payment technology systems
Smartcards
28. Smartcards or electronic purses have been developed as an alternative to currency
in paper and coin form. The electronic chip in the card can then store monetary value in
electronic form which may then be spent as currency. Because the value on the card has
already been debited from the financial institution, if the card is lost, there is no loss
to the institution. There is thus no inherent reason for the financial institution to
restrict the amount that may be held on an individual card
29. Smartcard systems in FATF member countries are mostly still in the prototype or
early testing phases. Among these systems, there are many variants in terms of specific
operating characteristics. Some of the systems are designed to provide transactional
anonymity, while others capture data which may be used to construct an audit trail. In
this regard, FATF members expressed some concern over the development of smartcard
distribution through automated vending machines, which would allow virtually anonymous
transfer of value to these cards. Within FATF member countries, the issuers/operators of
many smartcard systems have placed limits on the amount of money that may be loaded onto
the cards (for example, UK institutions have set the limits at GBP 50 - 500 [USD 82 -
820]); however, it was noted that this is not always the case. In one example, an
institution in a non-FATF member country reportedly markets a smartcard with an upper
limit of USD 92,000. Furthermore, while most smartcard systems do not permit so-called
peer-to-peer( direct card-to-card) transactions, others are
developing the capability to move funds among card holders without recourse to a financial
intermediary. In any case, it should be noted that, where there are limitations on card
functions, these have been set by the card issuers and not by the respective national
regulatory authorities.
On-line Banking
30. On-line banking has increasingly come to mean the method whereby certain types of
financial transactions may be performed through the Internet website of those banks that
offer this service. FATF members reported that there is a great deal of growth in this
area. In the United States, nearly 85% of financial institutions have or are planning to
establish such services. A significant number of financial institutions in other countries
have also set up on-line facilities. In its most basic form, the service provided includes
verification of cheque account balances and transfers among accounts at the same
institution. In those systems that allow payments or transfers to be made, the customer is
often restricted in the amount of transaction or the identity of the beneficiary. All of
the systems require that on-line operations be tied to an already existing account at the
institution; therefore, there is a continuous record of account activity
31. The concerns mentioned in this area refer, again, primarily a lack of uniform
regulation from supervisory authorities. Thus, although the customers activity is
tied to a particular account set up in his name, there is no way to verify the identity of
the Internet transactor once the account has been opened. Indeed, if the on-line financial
institution is located in an area known for high levels of banking secrecy and requires
little or no proof of identity for opening an account, the money launderer could
theoretically move funds from the convenience of his computer terminal. Although there
were no reported cases of this type of laundering taking place at this time, the experts
believed that technology was developing rapidly and thus worthy of further vigilance.
E-Cash
32. Electronic cash (or e-cash) seeks to provide a way of paying for goods
and services across the Internet. In concept, e-cash would replace notes and coins for
normal Internet transactions; however, it has the added advantage of being able to be
split into fractions of the lowest.9 denomination coins to allow what are termed
micropayments. These small payments could be made for reading specified
sections of on-line newspapers, for example. Under most existing payment systems, these
micropayment transactions would not be economical. With e-cash, the customer buys value
from an authorised provider as with the smart card however, the value is
then stored either in customers home computer or a safe repository on-line. When the
funds are spent, the e-cash value is credited to a retailers e-cash account that
then must be later up-loaded to the retailers regular bank account.
Security of e-cash systems is concerned primarily with ensuring that value cannot be
created except by authorised institutions or that the same value cannot be spent more than
one time.
33. Concerns with regard to e-cash are generally the same as those mentioned for smart
cards. Since only the initial purchase and the final settlement stages take place through
banks, the risk exists that there will be no way to track e-cash in transactions taking
place after the initial purchase and before final crediting of the value to a
retailers account. Some systems currently being tested have set limits to the amount
that an e-cash purse may hold; however, there is at present no uniform
regulatory standard, and it is not certain that such regulations would do much to limit
the use of e-cash by the consumer. The anonymity of e-cash, similar to coin and banknotes,
may also hinder the financial institution with reporting obligations from positively
identifying the ultimate source of an e-cash transaction. A further concern is that
currently available computer encryption systems may further shield e-cash transactions
from the scrutiny of investigative authorities.
Countermeasures
34. Smart cards appear to be able to replicate all of the functions of e-cash while
allowing portability and use in the real world, as well as over the Internet. There was
some uncertainty expressed, therefore, over the ultimate success of e-cash systems.
Nevertheless, the experts agreed that the field of new payment technologies is changing
very rapidly, and that developments in e-cash systems, along with those of the other
proposed systems, should continue to be monitored. The experts discussed a number of
possible measures that might limit the vulnerability to money laundering on the new
payment technologies. These measures included the following:
· limiting the functions and
capacity of smart cards (including maximum value and turnover limits, as well as number of
smart cards per customer); · linking
new payment technology to financial institutions and bank accounts; · requiring standard record keeping
procedures for these systems to enable the examination, documentation, and seizure of
relevant records by investigating authorities; and · establishing international standards for these measures.
(iv) Potential use of the gold market in money laundering operations General
35. Following last years introduction to the issue of money laundering through
the gold market, the FATF experts were asked to provide specific examples of such cases
from their national experience. A number of members did provide example of cases in which
gold transactions were an integral aspect of the investigated money laundering scheme.
These cases involved the purchase of gold with illegally obtained funds. The gold was then
exported to other locations where it was sold, these funds thus being legitimised as the
proceeds of gold sales. Existing reporting requirements for gold purchases were
circumvented by structuring the purchases to amounts below the reporting threshold..10
36. Several members reported that the vulnerability to money laundering within their
countries has increasingly centred on specialised gold bullion sellers. This is due in
part to the fact that anti-money laundering legislation targeting traditional financial
institutions has generally caused those customers desiring to purchase bullion anonymously
to turn to other sources. In many FATF member countries, there is no suspicious
transaction reporting requirement directed toward bullion dealers or other non-financial
banking institutions dealing in gold. Additionally, even though the import or export of
gold bullion seems to be a key part of money laundering schemes involving the material,
members reported that the lack of import / export reporting requirements appears to hamper
detection of illegal operations.
37. Members were in some cases able to identify cities or regions within their
jurisdictions that specialise in legitimate gold business (for example, Cordobá in Spain
and Arezzo and Vicenza in Italy) or in which significant business takes place (Paris
region and Marseilles in France). Gold purchases in these areas are often conducted in
cash and frequently in non-indigenous currency (especially US dollars). Gold serves as
both a commodity and, to a lesser extent, a medium of exchange in money laundering
conducted between Latin America, the United States and Europe. In this cycle, gold bullion
makes its way to Italy via Swiss brokers. There, it is made into jewellery, much of which
is then shipped to Latin America. In Latin America, this jewellery (or the raw gold from
which it was made) then becomes one of, if not the most important commodities (others
include various consumer goods and electronic equipment) in the black market peso exchange
money laundering scheme.
38. Several FATF members also mentioned having received suspicious transaction reports
involving gold transactions. In some instances, these transactions appeared to reflect
attempts to avoid high VAT rates by making large purchases of gold in countries with low
VAT rates and then exporting the bullion back to the country of origin where it could then
be resold at a profit.
Hawala / Hundi alternative remittance system and gold
39. The question of laundering through the use of gold as a commodity and as a medium
of exchange was discussed by the experts in the context of the hawala / hundi alternative
remittance system. The word hawala means trust or
exchange; hundi means bill of exchange. It is an
alternative remittance system that enables the transfer of funds without their actual
physical movement (often without the use of a traditional financial institution). Very
often, using hawala is more cost effective and less bureaucratic than moving funds through
officially recognised banking systems. Built on a system of trust and close business
contacts, hawala originated in South Asia; however, it is now used as an alternate
remittance system throughout the world.
40. In the laundering associated with this system, gold often plays the role of the
primary medium of exchange in certain transactions. Although many hawala transactions may
take place without gold, many of these transactions involving the movement of money to
South Asia often do involve the metal. There are two reasons for this: the first is the
combined historical, religious and cultural importance that gold enjoys in the region, and
the second is the increasing distrust in the value of local currencies (many South Asian
nations prohibit speculation on their currencies, and exchange rates are fixed by the
central banks). World-wide, gold is often used as a hedge against inflation; in South
Asia, gold is often the primary means of preserving and protecting wealth.
41. In one scenario, a gold dealer operating in one country also operates as the
banker for various jewellery shops in his region. These jewellery shops give
him the cheques and cash they receive for purchases; he processes these through his own
bank accounts. In return, he furnishes them with scrap gold and gold jewellery for use in
their businesses. He retains a few percentage points of the money he receives from them
for his services (as well as for the legal risk he is.11 incurring). The
owners of the jewellery shops do not have to deal with the bureaucracy of banking, and,
since there is almost no paper trail of their sales, they enjoy a greatly reduced tax
liability.
42. In another scenario, money may be moved from one country to another through the
hawala system. A hawaladar (hawala broker) based in one country facilitates
this movement by receiving payments in the local currency. He then makes contact with a
hawaladar in South Asia and instructs him to make the necessary payment to a specified
beneficiary in that local currency. In order to settle his accounts with the South Asian
hawaladars, the hawaladar in the first country might send postal money orders or some
other financial instruments to a precious metals house in the Persian Gulf. This precious
metals house then effects payment to the South Asian hawaladar in gold (either into a
safe-keeping account under his name or by direct export of the gold to the South Asian
location).
MONEY LAUNDERING TRENDS IN FATF COUNTRIES
Sources of illegal funds
43. Narcotics trafficking appears still to be the primary single source of criminal
proceeds among the majority of FATF members. The various types of fraud (fiscal, EU funds,
value added tax, insurance, bankruptcy, etc.) are the next major source of illegal funds,
if not, in some jurisdictions, the primary source. Organised crime activity generates a
considerable amount of illegal proceeds that are laundered in or through FATF member
countries. Some members have noted with concern the increasing trend for these crime
groups to operate in loose alliances (Russian and Latin American groups, for example).
Written submissions from some of the members also mentioned an increase in the number of
cases in which laundering was related to official corruption or the funding of
international terrorism.
44. The United States has recently substantially elevated the priority assigned to
combating terrorist financing (which can constitute the crime of money laundering in the
United States). In October 1997, the US government designated 30 foreign organisations as
foreign terrorist organisations. In June 1998, US federal authorities seized USD 1.4
million in cash and property held by individuals and an organisation whose funds were
reportedly part of a scheme to support Middle Eastern terrorism. The funds were
transferred by wire from Europe and the Middle East to financial institutions in the
United States and, through various means, were then used to facilitate recruitment,
training, and operations of the terrorist group Hamas. This case marks the first time that
civil asset forfeiture laws were used in the United States to seize assets suspected of
being involved in money laundering violations related to foreign terrorism. These
terrorist operations included a conspiracy to commit extortion, kidnapping, and murder
against the citizens and the government of Israel.
New or significant trends
General
45. Many of the submissions of FATF member countries noted an increase in suspicious
transaction reporting, both for certain individual money laundering methods and in overall
numbers of reports. As for new methods, however, with the exception of new payment
technologies described above, the submissions appear to indicate that launderers are using
the same practices that they have done in the past. Money laundering within FATF members
is characterised, therefore, by a finite number of techniques that can be combined into an
almost infinite variety of laundering schemes. Laundering activity is also characterised
by its ability to change quickly when faced with new countermeasures by shifting to other
techniques or mechanisms, combining these methods into new schemes, or by moving to
sectors or regions where government oversight represents less of a threat..12
46. Indeed, this last point was cited by virtually all members as a fundamental truth
of money laundering today: the lack of comprehensive preventive measures in a particular
sector or region will inevitably attract money laundering activity. Members continue to
mention bureaux de change, money remittance businesses, and casinos as particularly
vulnerable to laundering in some locations. Often these are combined with cash smuggling,
alternate remittance systems, or the use of offshore registered businesses, all of which
generally operate beyond the framework of traditional financial oversight systems.
47. Another particularly evident trend in the money laundering schemes described by the
FATF experts is the growing role played by professional services providers. Accountants,
solicitors, and company formation agents turn up ever more frequently in anti-money
laundering investigations. In establishing and administering the foreign legal entities
which conceal money laundering schemes, it is these professionals that increasingly
provide the apparent sophistication and extra layer of respectability to some laundering
operations. These services are offered not only at offshore locations (as described above)
but also within FATF member countries. One delegation described a money laundering scheme
in which a criminal group selected a firm of solicitors to act on their behalf in the
purchase of a company. The funds for the purchase were delivered to the solicitors in cash
and placed in a client account. When the purchase later fell through, the funds were
returned less fees to the criminal group in form of a cheque. In fact, the
group already owned the company they were attempting to buy and had arranged
for the failure of the sale since they only wished to convert their criminal proceeds into
a cheque from a respectable law firm. This scheme was revealed in a suspicious transaction
report from the law firm concerned. More often than not, however, professional services
providers are still not subject to suspicious transaction reporting requirements in FATF
members. Even when they are subject to such a requirement, the numbers of disclosures made
to authorities are frequently disappointing.
48. Even in instances where preventive measures have been implemented, laundering
activity still occurs, according to the FATF experts. When faced with suspicious
transaction reporting at both banks and other financial services, launderers frequently
resort to structured transactions to avoid the reporting threshold. Despite border
controls designed to detect smuggling of cash criminal proceeds, bulk shipments of cash
continue to be observed by FATF members. The use of legitimate appearing business
transactions claiming that proceeds are generated by a legal currency exchange
business, the profit from bona fide commodity sales, the result of factoring operations,
for example is a standard cover used by launderers to hide the criminal origin of
those funds. Members mentioned that the only indicator of money laundering in these cases
is often the disproportionate size of the transactions (either individually or in
aggregate) when compared to the expected economic activity of the business.
49. Several FATF members reported an increase in the appearance of insurance products
in laundering schemes. Various products have been noted, including life and property
insurance and long term capitalisation bonds. Launderers generally pay for the insurance
using the cash criminal proceeds. They then request early pay out of the policy (in the
case of life insurance or capitalisation products) or make a claim against the property
insurance, thus obtaining a legitimate insurance refund or claim payment.
50. Electronic funds transfers continue to be the preferred method for the layering of
criminal proceeds once they enter the legitimate financial system. Frequently, these
proceeds are smuggled out of the FATF member country, deposited into the financial system
at a foreign location, and then wired back to the country of origin. Wire transfers are
often associated with foreign registered business entities as described above. If criminal
proceeds are transmitted through transit accounts set up in offshore financial
centres or as have been found in some FATF member countries according to the
written submissions the beneficial owner of the funds is effectively hidden..13
Derivatives and securities markets
51. In recent FATF meetings, questions have arisen concerning the perceived
vulnerabilities of the derivatives and security markets as a vehicle for money laundering.
As part of the written submission of one member, a paper was prepared on this issue and
provided to the experts. According to the paper, there is good reason to suspect that
money laundering may pose a substantial threat in these markets. Compared to banks, the
derivatives markets and associated products represent perhaps a better opportunity for
laundering because of the ease with which audit trails can be obscured. Indeed, any
product that offers rapid commercial decision making, high speed transfer, obscurity of
control, or complication of audit trail is at risk. Operators in these markets, when
compared to banks, tend to be less familiar with anti-money laundering efforts. There is
also evidence a good example is the BCCI case which shows the readiness of
criminals to use financial products for laundering.
52. The primary opportunity for laundering is in the complex derivatives market.
Derivatives are securities that derive their value from another underlying financial
instrument or asset; they have no intrinsic value of their own. There are three primary
types of derivative contracts: forward contracts, futures, and options. All of these
instruments, in simple terms, are contracts sold as a hedge against the future risk of
fluctuations in commodity prices, time differentials, interest rates, tax rates, foreign
exchange rates, etc. Because of the flexible nature of these products, the derivatives
market is particularly attractive to operators willing to risk heavy losses. A high volume
of activity on the market is essential to ensure the high degree of liquidity for which
these markets are known. The way in which derivatives are traded and the number of
operators in the market mean that there is the potential obscuring of the connection
between each new participant and the original trade. No single link in the series of
transactions will likely know the identity of the person beyond the one with whom he is
directly dealing.
53. The derivatives markets have traditionally not been subject to strict regulatory
oversight under the assumption that its operators, as high risk investors, do not need the
same level of protection. The introduction of stricter controls would necessarily cause
investors to look elsewhere for these markets. For fear of scaring of investors, there is
thus no incentive for traders on the market to ask too many questions. This lack of
rigorous government control makes the derivatives market even more attractive from the
perspective of a money launderer.
New countermeasures implemented or significant modifications to existing measures
54. The level or type of money laundering activity can change rapidly in response to
countermeasures implemented by a particular jurisdiction. FATF members continue to
re-examine their anti-money laundering efforts and refine them where necessary. Faced with
difficulties in prosecuting money laundering under provisions dealing with receipt of
stolen goods, Sweden and the Netherlands plan to set up separate offences of money
laundering under their respective penal codes. Some FATF members have extended the list of
predicate offences for laundering or plan to do so.
55. Several FATF member countries are working to extend preventive measure (suspicious
transaction reporting) beyond the traditional banking sector. New Belgian legislation this
year, for example, extends suspicious transaction reporting (STR) requirements to real
estate agents, bailiffs (huissiers de justice), money courier services,
notaries, accountants, and casinos. Sweden plans to introduce a reporting requirement on
money laundering for external auditors.
56. The Netherlands has introduced legislation which requires money transfer businesses
to report unusual transactions. Germany has already placed a requirement on such
businesses to obtain a licence from the Federal Banking Supervisory Office (FBSO), the
same authority that oversees banking activity. Additionally, the FBSO requires that all
transactions dealing in foreign currency.14 valued at DEM 5,000 (USD 3,018) require
customer identification. Finland has extended suspicious transaction reporting to its
entire financial sector, includes casinos and other gambling related businesses, and has
consolidated reporting to a single financial intelligence unit. Similarly,
Switzerlands reinforced money laundering legislation, which also establishes a
centralised reporting unit, came into effect in April 1998. This legislation also extends
the suspicious transaction reporting obligation to all financial sectors.
57. Japan plans to enact legislation that will strengthen its measures for combating
money laundering and organised crime, and this legislation is currently under deliberation
in the Diet. This legislation will extend the number of predicate offences for money
laundering, provide for enlargement of the measures for confiscation and freezing the
proceeds of crime, and centralisation of suspicious transaction reporting under the
Financial Supervisory Agency.
58. Canada is working to amend existing legislation to require mandatory reporting of
suspicious transactions, as well as cross border movement of currencies. The amendment
will clarify the ambiguity surrounding the definition of suspicious transactions and when
they are required to be reported. Legislation permitting law enforcement to conduct money
laundering sting operations has already been implemented.
59. It has become clear that the analysis and discussion of trends in virtually all
FATF member countries now begins with analysis of suspicious transaction reports.
Preventive systems involving these reports, implemented and used widely to help detect
individual instances of money laundering, are the starting point for examining the money
laundering phenomenon from a more strategic point of view. This is reflective of the
increase in the number of FATF member states which now have functioning financial
intelligence units (FIUs) and mandatory suspicious transaction reporting regimes. The
written submissions of the experts, as well as the discussions during the typologies
meeting indicated that suspicious transaction reporting systems are becoming more
effective in detecting new money laundering methods. The ability of FIUs to share
information, even informally, has also dramatically increased.
MONEY LAUNDERING TRENDS OUTSIDE FATF COUNTRIES
60. Money laundering is a problem that is not restricted to FATF members alone.
Countermeasures implemented in FATF member countries have facilitated the collection and
analysis of information on money laundering activity within their respective national
areas. These countermeasures have also, in some cases, pushed certain money laundering
activity to jurisdictions having little or no anti-money laundering regime. At the same
time, an increasing number of non-FATF countries have established or are in the process of
developing effective money laundering countermeasures. Nevertheless, information provided
by the FATF experts on non-member countries is far from complete; therefore, the following
assessment of money laundering trends outside the FATF member countries does not claim to
be exhaustive.
Asia and the Pacific Region
61. Sources of information on money laundering activities in the region have been
limited. While few non-FATF members in the area have implemented comprehensive anti-money
laundering programmes, there have been some signs that individual countries are moving to
establish such systems. Some FATF members nevertheless continue to find evidence of
significant money laundering activity or serious vulnerabilities to it.
62. As noted in previous typologies exercises, South Asia continues to be one locus in
the region for such activity. It serves as home to several major international banks and
is a transhipment point for drugs produced in Afghanistan and Iran to the west and in
Myanmar, Thailand, and Laos to the.15 east. Money laundering related to the narcotics
trade, financial fraud, corruption, and other activities is believed to be carried out
through both the traditional banking system and the hawala / hundi alternative remittance
system.
63. In the Pacific region, a heavy concentration of financial activity related to
Russian organised crime has been observed, specifically in Western Samoa, Nauru, Vanuatu,
and the Cook Islands. One delegation mentioned an increasingly common scheme whereby
apparently American middlemen are used to open accounts or charter banks in one of the
locations. Given the increased suspicion aroused by visible Russian business activity in
these jurisdictions, the laundering scheme thus operates under the cover of non-Russian
linked business. Internet gambling, which generates nearly $1.5 million a month in this
region, represents a major new business trend in Western Samoa, Niue, Vanuatu, Tonga, and
Fiji and another potential vulnerability for money laundering and financial crime in those
jurisdictions.
64. FATF members greatly welcomed the fact that the Asia/Pacific Group (APG), this
regions new anti-money laundering body, held its first typologies workshop in
October 1998 in Wellington, New Zealand. Experts from 25 jurisdictions in the area and 4
international organisations met for two days to highlight the most significant money
laundering issues of their particular jurisdictions, as well as the Asia/Pacific region as
a whole. The Asia/Pacific Group had not yet released its final typologies report by the
time of the FATF experts meeting; however, the group provided a short submission to the
FATF which described some of the key findings of the APG experts.
65. The primary sources of criminal proceeds in the region were identified as
trafficking in human beings and illicit drugs, gambling and the activities of organised
crime groups. Some other identified sources include kidnapping, arms smuggling, hijacking,
extortion, public corruption, terrorism and tax evasion. It was also noted that the
perpetrators of the predicate offences commonly launder their own proceeds.
66. Among some of the methods employed for laundering, the APG experts cited the abuse
of offshore financial centres and the increasing presence of solicitors, accountants, and
other professionals both to set up business entities and facilitate the administration of
accounts used in money laundering. Structured transactions, purchase of monetary
instruments (bank drafts, cheques), and physical removal of currency or monetary
instruments were also observed in the region. Criminal proceeds have been moved through
the Asia/Pacific area by traditional (electronic) means, as well as alternative remittance
systems. The APG experts also mentioned that criminal proceeds are often transferred out
of the region under the guise of real estate or other investments, legitimate gambling
proceeds, and through the use of credit and debit cards. The group expressed similar
concerns to those mentioned by the FATF members regarding the development of new payment
technologies.
67. FATF members welcomed the APG decision to hold an annual typologies workshop and
noted that the second APG workshop will be held in Tokyo, Japan, on 2-3 March 1999. The
workshop will concentrate on the use of underground banking and alternative remittance
systems for money laundering purposes.
Central America, South America, and the Caribbean Basin
68. Drug trafficking and the money laundering activity it engenders continue to be
major problems in this region. While most of the countries of the Western Hemisphere have
moved to enact anti-money laundering legislation, a number of jurisdictions have not fully
implemented these countermeasures. Potential alliances between the regions narcotics
traffickers and Russian organised crime, already detected by some FATF members, are a
cause for concern, as they may further expand money laundering connections with Europe,
North America, and the Pacific regions..16
69. With regard to the Caribbean area, the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force
(CFATF) completed the last phases of its typologies exercise. The exercise comprised four
parts conducted over a two-year period. As mentioned in last years report, the first
two phases of its exercise examining laundering activities in domestic financial
institutions and through the gambling industry took place during 1997. Since then,
CFATF has undertaken an assessment of laundering as it occurs in international financial
transactions conducted in both domestic and offshore financial institutions, and also the
emerging cyberspace technologies. It is most encouraging to see that CFATF will organise a
typologies conference on the vulnerabilities of free trade zones to money laundering
activity. CFATF plans to use the conference, which will be hosted by Aruba in 1999, to
develop a model free zone compliance programme and code of conduct.
70. Money laundering activity in the Caribbean region remains a significant problem due
to its location near major narcotics production and consumption areas and its
concentration of offshore financial centres. Antigua was again cited as particularly
vulnerable due to its failure to implement fully its existing anti-money laundering
legislation. Free trade zones were also mentioned as continuing targets for money
laundering schemes. In one instance, wire transfers have increasingly replaced cash
deposits as the means of moving illegal proceeds through the jurisdiction. St. Kitts was
mentioned as being of some concern due to a reported increase in narcotics related
laundering activity. Suspicious transactions have been detected within French overseas
departments in the Caribbean area relating to structured deposits.
71. The laundering of criminal proceeds continues to affect the many other nations of
Latin America. Narcotics trafficking remains the primary source of these proceeds. Despite
steps taken by the Mexican government in the past year to address the problem, laundering
activity is still of serious concern in that country. Cross-border laundering of drug
proceeds between the United States and Mexico continues with currency smuggling, use of
payable through accounts, bureaux de change and the black market peso exchange identified
as the key laundering methods. Mexican drug cartels remain the primary force in this
activity, although the Colombians still play a role. These organisations are able to
operate in Mexico by taking advantage of loopholes in existing legislation. Corruption
continues to hamper the countrys anti-money laundering efforts.
72. Costa Rica was mentioned in connection to laundering activity through financial
institutions, casinos, bureaux de change, bulk currency smuggling, and real estate
investments. As reported last year, Colombia continues to see the black market peso
exchange being used as the primary money laundering system by narcotics traffickers based
in that country. The rising cocaine demand in Europe has reportedly resulted in an
increase in funds needing to be laundered in the area and the formation of new alliances
between Colombian narcotics traffickers and Russian organised crime groups.
73. With its role as a major finance and trading centre and its proximity to Colombia,
Panama remains attractive to money laundering schemes. The Colón Free Zone is a key
target for these laundering activities despite the extension of anti-money laundering
measures to the area. Suriname is another country of the region that has an increasingly
visible money laundering problem. Methods detected in that country include over-invoicing,
gold purchases and account manipulation. Recently, high-level Surinamese officials have
been implicated in laundering activity related to international narcotics trafficking.
Central and Eastern Europe
74. The countries of Central and Eastern Europe remain a significant concern to FATF
members. Illegal proceeds are generated by contract and privatisation fraud schemes, as
well as from the extraction and production of natural resources. In Central Europe,
financial institutions continue to.17 be victims of fraud schemes using misrepresented
collateral and carried out with the collusion of bank officials. Embezzlement of corporate
funds through false contracts is also still a problem.
75. Organised crime activity operating out of the former Soviet Union area was
mentioned as being of continuing concern. Many of these organised crime groups bring their
criminal proceeds to the nearby FATF members in Europe where they make large real estate
investments in such areas as the French and Spanish Mediterranean coast. The groups
frequently transfer their funds through various offshore financial centres, such as the
Channel Islands, Gibraltar, and the Caribbean area, before using the funds for these
investments. The transfers are sometimes made in the name of a legitimate appearing
business entity registered in an FATF member country; however, upon further investigation,
it is found that the company has no place of business or bank account in the country of
registry.
76. FATF members also noted their concern over potential connections of financial
institutions to Eastern European organised crime. It is difficult to determine the exact
role that Russian financial institutions may wittingly or unwittlingly play with regard to
organised crime activity. This difficulty extends to Russian business entities, as well.
One member noted that banks operating in Europe seem to be less critical when dealing with
other banks even if the counterpart is Russian.
77. A number of members noted an increase in the number of couriers of Central or
Eastern European origin involved in reports of unusual or suspicious transactions. These
transactions seem especially prevalent with regard to operations at bureaux de change
located in FATF member countries. The couriers have no known business or residence
connections in the country where they attempt to conduct single transactions with
relatively large amounts of cash (individual transactions range from USD 50,000 to USD
100,000). The large sums and the manner in which the transactions occur seem to indicate
that these individuals are not simple tourists.
78. Central and Eastern Europe countries have made a certain amount of progress in
developing, adopting and implementing countermeasures during past year. Some examples of
this progress include the following: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romania
have all enacted anti-money legislation. Latvia and Lithuania have operational financial
intelligence units, and Poland hopes to have an operational unit in the first part of
1999. Despite its many internal problems, Russia has enacted a new criminal code that
includes money laundering as a crime. The Russian anti-money laundering legislation is
scheduled to be approved by the countrys parliament in early 1999. Ukraine has
effectively abolished anonymous accounts, and its Ministry of Justice is in the process of
drafting its first comprehensive anti-money laundering laws. Nevertheless, some FATF
members noted that it is still often difficult to obtain information relating to
anti-money laundering investigations from certain of the countries of the region. One
member mentioned that many of the Central and Eastern European countries have experienced
similar frustrations in attempting to obtain information on foreign registered business
entities from offshore financial centres in support of their anti-money laundering
investigations.
79. FATF welcomed the further development of the Council of Europe initiative to
evaluate anti-money laundering systems. The select committee set up for this purpose has
adopted an evaluation process based on the one used by the FATF. Its goal is to evaluate
the countermeasures in place in each of the 21 members of the committee (the non-FATF
members of the Council of Europe). During the past year, the committee conducted seven
mutual evaluations. The committee also held its first typologies exercise in December
1998, and it is hoped that this will become a recurring event. Indeed, the Council of
Europe typologies exercise, along with those of APG, CFATF, and the FATF, should become
the basis for a much clearer picture of money laundering activities throughout the
world..18
Middle East and Africa
80. Information on laundering activities in this area of the world is extremely
limited. A number of factors favourable to money laundering are known to be present
throughout both regions. In the Gulf States (particularly in Bahrain), the banking and
finance industries are well established on an international scale. Only a few of the
jurisdictions of the region have anti-money laundering legislation. Many expatriate
labourers working in the region regularly send money home by using the traditional hawala
/ hundi alternate remittance system, which offers more favourable rates than those of
traditional banks. Gold smuggling is also reportedly used especially by some
professional criminal organisations as a means of moving funds through the Gulf
into the South Asian region. Free trade zones of the area are also likely to attract some
of this laundering activity.
81. Still less is known about the Mediterranean area. The growing presence of its own
financial centres and its role as a drug transit area appear to make the region vulnerable
to laundering activity. Such activity involving organised crime and the diamond industry
in Israel has been observed by some FATF experts. With only a few exceptions, most
jurisdictions of the region are characterised by the total absence of comprehensive
anti-money laundering programmes.
82. Africa south of the Sahara is also considered by many of the FATF experts to be
vulnerable to money laundering, although, again, information on the region is limited. A
factor which contribute to this vulnerability is the increasingly widespread activity of
indigenous and, to certain extent, non-indigenous organised crime groups. These groups can
operate throughout the region due to lack of strong anti-money laundering laws, combined
with the endemic corruption, lack of training, and low pay of government authorities. Only
South Africa has criminalised money laundering for crimes beyond those related to
narcotics trafficking; however, it has yet to enact comprehensive preventive measures. In
other countries of the region, it is believed that only about 20% of the population use
traditional banks; thus, there is some concern about how preventive measures could be
applied there.
83. FATF experts noted again the ubiquity of West African (especially Nigerian)
organised crime groups in money laundering schemes that link FATF countries with the
region. As noted in previous reports, fraud seems to be one of the most pervasive sources
for laundered funds; however, these groups are also involved in narcotics trafficking,
arms smuggling, auto theft, gemstone and ivory smuggling, and trafficking in stolen
identity documents. One member noted that there were increasingly ties with some of the
francophone countries of western Africa, particularly Togo, Benin, and Senegal. In
general, there appears to be a growing frequency of using bureaux de change operations as
a cover for converting criminal proceeds. Some groups are using bank accounts in FATF
member countries as collector accounts for these proceeds. Funds from these accounts are
then used for the purchase of goods that are shipped to Africa and sold as
legitimate imports. The holders of these accounts charge a percentage for
their use but otherwise have neither interest in the source of the funds nor any direct
link to the transactions.
CONCLUSIONS
84. The London meeting of the group of experts on typologies in November 1998 was the
second to undertake in-depth discussions on more focused topics. As mentioned last year
and as evidenced by the written submissions of the FATF delegations, the basic techniques
and mechanisms for money laundering have been well documented. This meeting examined a
number of areas that had not been fully developed. It is hoped, therefore, that the
purpose of these expert meetings will continue to be the identification of new approaches
taken by launderers, along with significant changes in the patterns of their activity.
Through this work, the FATF will acquire additional support and, one might hope, new ideas
for appropriate laundering countermeasures..19
85. With regard to the money laundering implications of the introduction of the euro in
the eleven members of the Economic Monetary Union, experts agreed that there was a
potential risk of overwhelming of existing preventive measures due to the increased burden
of work for financial institution personnel during the transition phase. The experts also
agreed that the introduction of the euro would be a possible opportunity to detect
laundering activity. The critical time as far as risk is concerned is the period from
January to June 2002, when euros in coin and paper form will replace national currencies.
Existing preventive countermeasures should be adequate in detecting possible laundering
activity, although a number of FATF members are taking extra steps to re-emphasise or
reinforce their anti-money laundering programmes. Some experts believe that the
introduction of the large denomination euro banknote (EUR 500) after 1 January 2002 could
affect laundering activity by reducing the bulkiness of criminal proceeds when
transported.
86. Non-cooperative jurisdictions or territories remain a continuing area of concern to
FATF members. The inability to obtain relevant information on the beneficial owners of
foreign legal entities shell companies, international business corporations,
offshore trusts, etc. represents one of the major roadblocks to successfully
detecting, investigating and prosecuting suspected international money launderers. There
is the need to foster increased awareness of this problem and exert pressure on certain
offshore financial centres in international fora where appropriate. The efforts of the
FATF ad hoc working group on non-cooperative countries both FATF and non-FATF
members will be most welcome in this area.
87. Rapid development and growing consumer acceptance of smartcards, on-line banking,
and e-cash continue to be the hallmark of these new payment technologies. As recently as
two years ago, many of these systems were not yet beyond the prototype stage, and the
potential implications on laundering activity were seen as theoretical. Smartcards are
beginning to move beyond testing, and on-line banking is already a reality in a few FATF
member countries (and potentially available world-wide through the Internet). The abuse of
these systems by launderers is no longer a distant possibility. FATF experts noted that
certain money laundering countermeasures could be easily added to the systems; however,
decisions to do so have been left to the system developers. Without consistent standards
and appropriate regulatory oversight, these new payment technologies will remain highly
vulnerable to money laundering activity.
88. Awareness of the potential role of the gold market and, by extension, of
other high-value commodities markets is growing among FATF member countries.
Transactions involving gold are increasingly found in money laundering schemes and are
often an integral part of money movements through various parallel banking systems, such
as the hawala / hundi system discussed during this typologies meeting. It was emphasised
that these money laundering schemes are not limited to any single region of the world.
Nevertheless, the particular focal point of gold dealers in the Gulf States for hawala /
hundi money movements to and from the South Asia region should be noted.
89. The experts noted the apparent increasing trend for professional services providers
accountants, solicitors, company formation agents, and other similar professions
to be associated with more complex laundering operations. These professionals set
up and often run the legal entities that lend the high degree of sophistication and
additional layers of respectability to such money laundering schemes. Operating not only
in certain offshore locations where they are protected behind a wall of strict
confidentiality, these professionals sometimes also provide similar services within FATF
member countries themselves. Currently, only a few FATF members impose an obligation on
professional services providers to report suspicious transactions. Those members that do
have this requirement are not always satisfied with the amount of reporting that takes
place from this sector, although the quality of individual reports in some cases appears
to justify the need for such reporting..20
90. Lastly, this meeting of experts on money laundering typologies has shown in another
way the utility of the preventive measures put in place to counter money laundering. The
analysis and discussion of methods and trends in virtually all FATF member countries began
with analysis of suspicious transaction reports. These systems, implemented to help detect
individual instances of money laundering have now become the starting point for examining
the phenomenon from a more strategic point of view. Given the insight that this source of
information provides to the state of money laundering in a particular jurisdiction, this
use of STRs is an encouraging development. 10 February 1999.21
ANNEX TO THE 1998-1999 FATF REPORT ON MONEY LAUNDERING TYPOLOGIES
Selected cases of money laundering
Case Nš 1: Accounting firm
Case Nš 2: Structuring scheme
Case Nš 3: Gold smuggling
Case Nš 4: Insurance policies and real estate
Case Nš 5: Front companies
Case Nš 6: Money transfers
Case Nš 7: Offshore financial centres, solicitors, and other financial services
providers
Case Nš 8: Front companies, insurance, and bureaux de change Case Nš 9: The
derivatives market: a typology
Case Nš 1
Accounting firm
Facts
Beginning in May 1994, two alleged narcotics traffickers used an accounting firm to
launder criminal proceeds generated from amphetamine sales. The clients of the
firm would on a regular basis hand their accountant cash in brown envelopes or shoe boxes
for which no receipt was issued. The funds were then stored in the accountants
office until he decided how they could be introduced into the financial system and
laundered. At any one time, there were between USD 38,000 and USD 63,000 stored in the
accountants office. The law enforcement agency investigating the matter found that
the accountant established company and trust accounts on behalf of his clients and opened
personal bank accounts in the names of relatives. He then made structured deposits to
those accounts with the funds received from the alleged traffickers. Additionally, he
transferred approximately USD 114,000 overseas again, using structured transactions
to purchase truck parts, which were later brought back into the country and sold at
a profit, and also used some of the funds to purchase properties. The accountant and three
of his colleagues (who were also implicated in the scheme) reportedly laundered
approximately USD 633,900 and received a 10% commission for his services..22 Results The
accountant and his colleagues are believed to have acted from the beginning with the
suspicion that the clients were involved in illegal activities. Even after obtaining
further specific knowledge of his clients involvement in narcotics trafficking, he
and his associates allegedly continued to facilitate money laundering. Lessons This case
highlights the key role that financial experts can play in the laundering of criminal
proceeds. Many of the services provided (establishment of specialised accounts or business
entities, making real estate investments) are potential money laundering mechanisms that
may be beyond the abilities of the less sophisticated criminal.
Case Nš 2
Structuring scheme
Facts
This case came to the attention of the police through an informant. An individual
residing in a small town deposited the equivalent of USD 1,038,354 over a three year
period into three financial institutions. The institutions involved were two of the
countrys major banks and a credit union. Nearly 95% of the deposits were made in
cash. The account holder into whose accounts the deposits were made was the citizen of a
neighbouring country where there had been an outstanding arrest warrant against him since
1982. During the investigation, it was determined that the employees of the financial
institutions had been suspicious of the account activity. They had noticed, for example,
that some deposits were made in brown paper bags through the night deposit drawer, yet
they did not disclose this information to authorities. Funds deposited into the accounts
were ultimately transferred to the account holder by his writing cheques on these
accounts. Results Whether or not suspicious transactions were reported was unfortunately
left to the discretion of the financial institution. In this case, the institution
employees could not be found to have violated any rules. Due to a lack of vigilance on the
part of financial institution employees, even to very obvious suspicious financial
activity, an individual was able to launder a substantial sum of money. Lessons This
example reinforces the need to ensure that financial institution employees know what sort
of financial activities might be suspicious and thus worthy of reporting. This case
illustrates the advantage of mandatory suspicious transaction reporting. Having such an
obligation provides an additional incentive for financial institutions to ensure that
their employees have thorough knowledge of what constitutes suspicious financial activity.
Furthermore, once in place, mandatory suspicious transaction reporting serves as a
deterrent for some of the relatively unsophisticated laundering schemes as described
here..23
Case Nš 3
Gold smuggling
Facts
In 1997, a financial intelligence unit (FIU) in country A received various suspicious
transaction reports involving nationals from Scandinavian countries. These individuals
were making large purchases of gold in their own names using cash in the currencies of
their home countries. The transactions were conducted at various financial institutions in
country A. Initial examination of the disclosures indicated that the Scandinavian
nationals had neither an official address nor any known legal activity in country A.
Information obtained from police and FIUs in their countries of origin revealed that some
of the participants in the scheme had outstanding arrest warrants for serious tax fraud.
The individuals were suspected to have purchased gold in country A and elsewhere (where
the value added tax rate on gold is lower). They then sold the gold in their home
countries via various companies. The suspicious transactions initially appeared to be
separate incidents; however, they were grouped together based on such factors as profile
of the participants, financial organisations target, and the dates of the transactions. At
one of the bureaux de change where the transactions took place, examination of numerical
sequence of exchange statements and gold sales invoices provided further information on
the methods used by the Scandinavian nationals. For example, the suspects would sometimes
conduct their transactions together, and at other times they split up their funds and
conducted identical operations on the same day with a series of targeted financial
institutions. The co-ordination among seemingly separate transactions seems to indicate
that participants in the scheme were all likely couriers for the same organisation.
Results Given the suspicious nature of this group transactions, the dossier was passed
over to the public prosecutor in country A. The dossier also contributed useful evidence
to ongoing investigations on the home countries of the suspects. Lessons Criminal
organisations that are willing to devote the human resources to spreading their laundering
operation over a larger geographic area are thus more likely to go undetected. This scheme
would not have been detected if the various suspicious transaction reports could not have
been brought together and compared. Likewise, the full picture of the scheme could not
have been developed had there not been information sharing with foreign counterpart
authorities.
Case Nš 4
Insurance polices and real estate
Facts
An insurance company informed an FIU that it had underwritten two life insurance
policies with a total value of USD 268,000 in the name of two European nationals. Payment
was made by a cheque drawn on the accounts of a brokerage firm in a major EU financial
market and a notary in the south-eastern region of the country..24 The two policies were
then put up as collateral for a mortgage valued at USD 1,783,000 that was provided by a
company specialising in leasing transactions. As the policyholders did not pay in their
own name, the issuer contacted the brokerage firm in order to discover the exact origin of
the funds deposited in its account. It was informed that the funds had been received in
cash and that the parties concerned were merely occasional clients. The parties two
brothers were known to a law enforcement agency through a separate investigation
into the illegal import and export of classic automobiles. Moreover, two individuals with
the same surname were suspected by the same agency of drug trafficking and money
laundering. Results This case has not yet been passed to the prosecutorial authorities.
Lessons This example shows the necessity for non-bank financial businesses (in this case
insurance companies) to be aware of what constitutes suspicious financial activity. It
also demonstrates the critical need for effective co-ordination between the information
contained in suspicious transaction reports and law enforcement information.
Case Nš 5
Front companies
Facts
An FIU in country B received a report of a series of suspicious transactions involving
the bank accounts of a West African citizen and his businesses, which specialised in
industrial fishing. These accounts were opened in banks located in country B and consisted
primarily of money changing operations. The businessman also owned several residences in
his home country and in the capital region of country B. The companies that he jointly
managed all had the same address in his home country. The personal account of the West
African businessman received a number of transfers from accounts in another European
country and in his home country (over USD 2 million from 1995 to 1996). The business
accounts of the companies received transfers from several business entities based in
Europe which were ostensibly linked to fishing related activities (over USD 7 million from
1994 to 1997). The transfers out of the account (estimated at nearly USD 4 million over
the same period) were made to various companies whose business was (according to official
records) connected with maritime activity and to other individuals. The FIUs
analysis showed that the income of the West African companies concerned was grossly
disproportionate to reported sales. In fact, the account transactions seemed to have
little to do with industrial fishing (i.e., foreign currency sales, transfers from the
bank accounts of European residents, transfers between the personal account of the West
African businessman and his businesses, transfers between these businesses and those of
Europe-based partners). Furthermore, according to additional information received by the
FIU, one of the partners of the West African businessman, a co-manager of one of the
companies, was suspected of being involved in several financial offences in Italy. This
individual reportedly had close associations with two.25 Italian organised crime figures,
and his Italian businesses have become the target of investigation into money laundering
in that country. Still another business partner of the West African businessman appears
also to be involved in financial and fiscal offences. Results This case has not yet been
passed to prosecutorial authorities. Lessons Given the unusual account transactions and
the lack of a clear economic connections for some of the business activities, the
operations described in this example very likely constitute a money laundering scheme to
conceal the illegal sources of proceeds derived from various criminal activities. This
case gives further support to the need for analysis of information from a variety of
sources (suspicious transaction reports, financial institutions, company registries,
police records, etc.) in order to gain a full picture of a complex laundering scheme.
Case Nš 6
Money transfers
Facts
In July 1997, the police arrested the leader of an Iranian drug trafficking group,
suspect A, for possessing stimulants and other kinds of drugs. The subsequent
investigation revealed that the suspect had remitted part of his illegal proceeds abroad.
A total of USD 450,000 was remitted via three banks to an account on behalf of suspect
As older brother B at the head office of an international bank in Dubai. Transfers
were made on five occasions during the two months between April and June 1998 in amounts
ranging from USD 50,000 to USD 150,000). Another individual, suspect C, actually remitted
the funds and later returned to Iran. On each occasion, C took the funds in cash to the
bank, exchanged them for dollars, and then had the funds transferred. Each of the
transactions took about one hour to conduct, and the stated purpose for the remittances
was to cover living expenses. Results Suspect A was initially charged with
violating provisions of the anti-narcotics trafficking law. The money transfers revealed
during the investigation led to additional charges under the anti-money laundering law.
This was the first time that anti-money laundering provisions had been applied to the
overseas transfers criminal proceeds. Court proceedings for this case are on-going.
Lessons This case represents a classic example of a simple money laundering scheme and is
also a good example of a case derived not just from suspicious transaction reporting but
also as a follow-up to traditional investigative activity..26
Case Nš 7
Offshore financial centres, solicitors, and other financial services providers
Facts
In December 1997, M-Bank, acting as an international clearing bank, received a wire
transfer for USD 1.4 million that appeared to originate from a UK law firm. The transfer
was to be credited to the account of AZ Brokerage International, Ltd. in
G-Bank. Due to the initials used in the companys name, M-Bank suspected that AZ
Brokerage International, Ltd. might be a controlled by Mr. AZ, who was known
to be involved in dubious financial activities. The bank also knew that Mr. AZ had served
two years in a foreign prison for his connections to a false monetary instrument scheme
and that his personal assets were subject to bankruptcy proceedings. M-Bank decided to
make a suspicious transaction report to the FIU, and, at the same time, they informed
G-Bank of their suspicion. G-Bank subsequently disclosed to the FIU that Mr. AZ was
operating a number of accounts opened under the names of various companies, including AZ
Brokerage International, Ltd. Preliminary inquiries made by the FIU revealed, among other
things, the following: · A
third financial institution, D-Bank, had submitted a report to the FIU a few weeks
earlier. The report stated that D-Bank had concluded its banking relationship with Mr. AZ
after having received several suspicious approaches from him and from foreign
sources. · Mr. AZ appeared to
be the principal of 20 legal entities registered in the national company registry. All of
these business entities operated from his home address. · The names of the businesses indicated involvement in
various types of financial activity, such as AZ Fiduciary & Nominees,
AZ Investment & Finance, AZ Insurance Guaranty Fund, etc. · The holding company, AZ Holding, Ltd. was
stated to have a fully paid share capital of 20 million USD confirmed by the
companys state authorised accountant. · None of the companies were licensed to provide any type of financial or brokering
services in the country of registry, according to the financial supervisory authority. The
FIU requested that the banks disclose additional information on their banking relationship
with Mr. AZ or legal entities controlled by him. G-Bank was further requested to freeze
the amount of 1.4 million USD as soon as it was credited to the account controlled by Mr.
AZ. This additional information revealed that a number of deposits had been made to the
relevant accounts prior to the FIU disclosures. All deposits were made by international
wire transfer, and the largest amounted to USD 1.5 million. Most of the funds received had
been immediately used to purchase bank drafts that were sent to individuals and companies
in the United Kingdom and the United States. It was also noted that the purpose of one
wire transfer to a US law firm was stated as being a legal fee for establishment of
AZ Merchant Bank. The above mentioned information was submitted to a criminal
investigation team, and the next day Mr. AZ requested that G-Bank transfer several hundred
US dollars to an offshore bank account in the name of an individual. The transaction was
stopped, and Mr. AZ was arrested as he was due to.27 depart on holiday to the Caribbean
where he had planned to meet with several apparently associated individuals. Documents
subsequently seized provided the following information: · The stated share capital of AZ Holding, Ltd. was based
on a Certificate of Deposit with the face value of USD 20 million and issued by a
Panamanian financial institution. · Mr. AZ, in addition to the business entities registered in his country, also held
beneficial and formal positions in a number of business entities incorporated in several
offshore jurisdictions, including AZ Private Bank, Ltd. registered in Antigua.
· The name of the above
mentioned AZ Merchant Bank, Inc. had been changed to AZ Banque de
Commerce, Inc. on the advice of the solicitor that later arranged for US
incorporation. · Mr. AZ claims
to provide various types of financial services, including private banking and issue of
proof of funds for use in various types of high-yield investment programmes,
etc. · A large number of
foreign clients mainly from Eastern Europe and the United States had made
the initial payment in amounts between USD 5,000 and USD 50,000 to get access to his
services. After the arrest of Mr. AZ, the investigation team was contacted and later
visited by several individuals who claim to represent the beneficiaries of three of the
deposits amounting to nearly USD 3.5 million including USD 1.6 million that had been
frozen. However, no beneficial party was prepared to make a formal statement or to provide
documentary evidence of the source of the funds. No formal claims for the release of the
seized funds had been received eleven months after the investigation began. Results Mr. AZ
was released from custody during the on-going investigation. It appeared, however, that he
immediately resumed the same business upon his release. The investigative authority has
recently requested the assistance of foreign law enforcement authorities in their
investigation regarding USD 20 million that had been transferred from an offshore
financial centre to the account of one of Mr. AZs companies. Lessons This case
illustrates how financial services providers operating in one country or through an
offshore financial centre may facilitate money laundering, as well as legitimate business
transactions. With any one jurisdiction having only one part of the picture, it is
difficult to determine exactly how the whole scheme works. The fact that, after blocking
the transfer of funds for eleven months, there were still no concrete claims from the
beneficial owners for their return is also a further indication that the funds may not
have been of strictly legal origin. This case is also a good example of how financial
institutions can work with each other and anti-money laundering authorities to pull
together a picture of the suspected laundering scheme..28
Case Nš 8
Front companies, insurance, and bureaux de change
Facts
An FIU received a suspicious transaction report from an insurance company that
specialised in life insurance. The report referred to Mr. H, born and resident in a Latin
American country, as having recently taken out two sole premium life insurance
policies for a total amount of USD 702,800. Subsequent information provided to the
FIU indicated that the policies premiums had been paid with two personal cheques made out
by a third party and drawn against a major bank. The third party, Mr. K, was also a
resident in the same Latin American country although not a national of that country.
Further checks at Mr. Ks bank revealed that both he and Mr. H had signature
authority on two business accounts, Sam, Ltd. and Dim, Ltd. Examination of the accounts
showed, especially in Mr Ks account, that transactions were carried out on behalf of
Mr H. Thus, the account had received funds from abroad and had also been used for other
financial products besides the life insurance policies. Indeed, ten cheques in US dollars
drawn against American banks and issued by two bureaux de change operating out of the
Latin American country where the two men resided, had been deposited into Mr Ks
account. The value of these cheques totalled USD 1,054,200. This activity appeared to show
that the funds had been used to pay the insurance premium on Mr. Hs life and to
acquire stakes in investment funds, also for Mr. H, amounting to another USD 210,840.
There were also other related transactions in the accounts of the two companies and Mr
Hs personal account. Cash or cheque transactions for amounts between USD 14,000 and
USD 70,000 were among the related transactions. In one instance, a cheque was drawn of the
Sam, Ltd. account for USD 63,300 on the day following the deposit of USD 70,280 in cheques
into Mr Ks account. Checks into the backgrounds of Mr. H and Mr. K revealed that Mr.
H was suspected of being involved in cocaine trafficking in Latin America. Mr. K had some
minor violations (writing bad cheques, etc.); however, he had no serious criminal
background. The business activities and backgrounds of Sam, Ltd. and Dim, Ltd. were also
looked at. In both instances, the companies had been incorporated with a stock capital of
USD 36,400 in which Mr. H and Mr. K had a 50% interest and were joint directors. Queries
made at the Balance of Payments Office as to foreign collection and payment
revealed a total absence of operations in the previous two financial years. Result It
appeared, therefore, that Mr. K was being used as the front man for Mr. Hs efforts
to move funds out of his country of residence. For greater security of the scheme, firms
under their control were established that did not perform any corporate or commercial
activity. Mr. H received the funds deposited in Mr. Ks account through the sole
premium insurance policies and shares in investment funds that had been paid for by that
account, as well as through indirect income from the companies mentioned. In this case,
the FIU believed there to be sufficient signs of money laundering and therefore passed the
matter on to prosecutorial authorities. Lessons This operation is interesting because it
shows that payment instruments or third party involvement having no apparent economic
relationship to the transaction are often a key indicator of suspicious activity. It is
worth noting that Mr. K was obviously selected based on his lack of prior criminal record
and his nationality so as to minimise suspicion. The activities of the front companies
were.29 also conducted in such a way as to give the appearance of transactions from
corporate activities. The case also highlights the potential value of suspicious
transaction reporting by insurance companies.
Case Nš 9
The derivatives market: a typology
The following typology is provided as an example of how funds could be laundered using
the derivatives market. In this method, the broker must be willing to allocate genuinely
losing trades to the account in which criminal proceeds are deposited. Instead of relying
on misleading or false documentation, the broker uses the genuine loss making
documentation to be allocated to the detriment of the dirty money account holder. As an
example, a broker uses two accounts, one called A into which the client
regularly deposits money which needs laundering, and one called B which is
intended to receive the laundered funds. The broker enters the trading market and
goes long (purchases) 100 derivative contracts of a commodity, trading at an
offer price of $85.02, with a tick size of $25. At the same time he goes
short (sells) 100 contracts of the same commodity at the bid price of $85.00. At
that moment, he has two legitimate contracts which have been cleared through the floor of
the exchange. Later in the trading day, the contract price has altered to $84.72 bid and
$84.74 offered. The broker returns to the market, closing both open positions at the
prevailing prices. Now, the broker, in his own books assigns the original purchase at
$85.02 and the subsequent sale at $84.72 to account A. The percentage difference between
the two prices is 30 points or ticks (the difference between $84.72 and $85.02). To
calculate the loss on this contract, the tick size which is $25 is multiplied by the
number of contracts, 100, multiplied by the price movement, 30. Thus: $25 x 100 x 30 =
$75,000 (loss). The other trades are allocated to the B account, which following the same
calculation theory of tick size multiplied by the number of contracts multiplied by the
price movement results in a profit as follows: $25 x 100 x 26 = $65,000 (profit). The
account containing the money to be laundered has just paid out $75,000 for the privilege
of receiving a profit of $65,000 on the other side. In other words, the launderer has paid
$10,000 for the privilege of successfully laundering $75,000. Such a sum is well within
the amount of premium which professional launderers are prepared to pay for the privilege
of cleaning up such money. As a transaction, it is perfectly lawful from the point of view
of the broker. He has not taken the risk of creating false documentation, which could
conceivably be discovered, and everything has been done in full sight of the market. |